The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Wrong venue (and no reason given). Soft redirects should be nominated at WP:RFD instead. (non-admin closure) –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:09, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Waggery[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No longer needed. Sysages (talk | contribs) 06:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 2. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 15:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural note: Per Wikipedia:Soft redirect#Deletion, deletion discussions about soft redirects should be had at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep (procedural): improper location for this discussion. "For more deliberative deletion, soft redirects should be handled through Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion, and are not subject to either Wikipedia:Proposed deletion or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion" (Wikipedia:Soft redirect#Deletion. Best, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.