The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 13:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WZMT - Minecraft Radio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails the general notability guideline and WP:WEB and ultimately should not have an article. However, it does not qualify for an A7 as it makes a claim of significance and my PROD was contested. There appears to be no sources other than the social media and iTunes links, which are primary sources and cannot be used to demonstrate notability. Additionally, when researching for the sources, there does not seem to be sufficient secondary sources to garner notability for the topic at hand. Tutelary (talk) 05:51, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Tutelary says it all – not enough coverage in RS to show notability. BethNaught (talk) 06:53, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per criteria A7 and G11. VQuakr (talk) 08:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, Found no evidence of any notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:46, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment/Neutral Made some improvements to the article, none of which address notability. RevelationDirect (talk) 11:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment/Neutral Added a source that sites the history section. Zachster1996 (talk) 13:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:19, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources, just links to social sites, mobile application stores and personal website. Non notable web content per WP:WEBCRIT. ///EuroCarGT 05:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Sources are not WP:RS per above comment from User:EuroCarGT. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:49, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 20. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 04:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of reliable sources about the station. It also bears mention that if you compare the creator's username to the name of the person who launched the station, there's a probable conflict of interest here — which, as always, isn't a deletion rationale in and of itself if good sources exist to salvage the article with, but is an additional reason why the article can't be kept if such sources aren't locatable. Bearcat (talk) 05:18, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.