The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP Engine[edit]

WP Engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

asserts a lot of notability, but I was unable to find independent sources that didn't read like press releases Deunanknute (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 18:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added a section of "Critical Response," with 1st-party references both about the company itself and its impact on Austin (i.e. multiple awards for best place to work) as well as on the product (i.e. reviews both from customers and from professional experts), as well as WP Engine's role in the WordPress community over the past 5 years, none of which are PR-based. There are literally dozens of additional online reviews of the product; I could include more than the three now cited if that would be useful in demonstrating notability. I do understand that the information in "company history" is not notable, but are relevant to the description of the company. Asmartbear (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Awards don't necessarily make a company any more notable. Blah2 (talk) 00:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.