This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was extreme lesbian DELETE. — JIP | Talk 16:22, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

W00w00[edit]

Either rewrite to actually be an article, instead of a collection of nonsense and templates, or delete. Tom- 11:06, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Extreme lesbian delete. *cough*. --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:14, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, the organisation is real, but it's probably some kind of joke organisation and not notable enough for Wikipedia. — JIP | Talk 11:15, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - nn. And not funny, either. CLW 11:48, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Extreme homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual, asexual, polyamorous, monoamorous, furry, fetishistic etc etc etc delete (just besting MarkGallagher) erm ... so badly written it should just be wiped! --TimPope 18:23, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This article is ridiculous, useless and IMO vanityBrian1979 21:10, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nonsense. Shauri 20:18, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.