The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Traintalk 08:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Votiro[edit]

Votiro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:What Wikipedia is not and WP:Paid (legal policy) apply, since the history shows clear signs of undisclosed paid contributing and any potential signs is cause for deletion alone; current sources are all still only company announcements, mentions, quotes, interviews, etc. An article could easily be improvable but not when the mere foundation is consisting of promotionalism, something that is contrary to an encyclopedia. Also, instances like this show promotionalism has been removed but to no serious help to the article. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 15:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • We really need to know what those sources are, otherwise the closing admin will see this comment as WP:ILIKEIT. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:47, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.