The result was keep. Per ANI can we have a single discussion somewhere? Spartaz Humbug! 04:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and this topic is not encyclopedic. Basket of Puppies 13:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The rationales for keep are already stated by other users on some of the many places were you rise the issue.
Visa policy is substantial part of foreign policy between states. Alinor (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A few hours ago Basket of Puppies went on a deletion spree suggesting that many of these articles were factually inaccurate. Since it was pointed out that many of the articles are directly based on reliable sources, Basket of Puppies has rephrased their reason for deletion, and pasted that across many articles instead, despite a number of objections in various locations. I think it would have been appropriate for Basket of Puppies to seek consensus, or address concerns, before going on another deletion spree. Basket of Puppies seems to have been in such a hurry to delete so many articles, without actually reading them, that a duplicate delete was created.[1]
Basket of Puppies now seems to argue that foreign policy between states is unencyclopaedic.[2] That is different from their previous reasons for deletion but, I think, no more believable.
I think it would be better to deal with this centrally, but Basket of Puppies has repeatedly said that it must be done on an article-by-article basis. It is unfortunate that people who disagree with Basket of Puppies are warned about their failure to AGF:[3] bobrayner (talk) 13:58, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]