The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vikas Amte[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I fail to see how he clinches WP:GNG.Notab. is not inherited.Is a recipient of few non-notable local awards. Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pure promotionalism for him and his hospital. it is possible the hospital is notable; it is possible its founder was notable. But none of that means that he is. DGG ( talk ) 17:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the Right Livelihood Award is notable but it does not appear that he actually received it (his father was a recipient in 1991, but that does not make the son notable). No other claims to notability, and heavily promotional. —bonadea contributions talk 18:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional and does not qualify per Wikipedia notability guidelines. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I would suggest to remove the material which is found to be promotional and keep the article. I do not think it is a promotional article at all. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 04:56, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

it is not just promotionalism that is the problem; a problem of almost equal importance is that it does not meet either of the two possible standards for notability, either WP:GNG or WP:PROF DGG ( talk ) 01:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.