The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vezeeta[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Too early to make a significance. Press coverage is trivial and investment onlys. Light2021 (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2016-07 ✗ G11

Delete Fails WP:GNG due to a lack of sustained WP:SIGCOV in independent reliable sources. I would also note the creator of the article was indef-blocked less than a week after creating this article due to their problematic editing, which included significant sourcing and content issues. The article has had very few edits since its creation. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:04, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.