The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 05:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Veripic[edit]

Blatant advertisement. I caught this article months ago on RC Patrol and edited, wikified and tagged it as needing cleanup and references. Since then nothing has been done except to make it more blatantly into an advert. Hasty Delete Zunaid 11:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: If anyone else feels there is merit in it, please also consider adding Dataworks Plus to this nomination. Although it is not as blatant as the above, it still seems suspiciously like self-promotion, not to mention that it includes cross-promotion of Veripic as well. It has been tagged for cleanup since December 2005, with nothing being done since then. Zunaid 11:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment 2: While we're at it, Digital Photo Management seems to be an article almost exclusively about SQL database storage of digital photos (needless to say, also mentioning Veripic along the way), whereas a Google search of the term brings up more generic things like photo album software. It is more subtle than the above two, but still seems like self-promotion of a field (and it's associated software) in order to CREATE awareness rather than report neutrally and encyclopedically on already newsqorthy facts. Zunaid 11:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete rather strong POV, and adcruft to boot. -- stubblyhead | ^T/_c 17:46, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an ad. Devotchka 18:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete one and two, but Merge DPM into Digital Asset Management and get rid of its promotional stuff about companies. --Chaser (T) 23:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.