The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Veniqa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT. A WP:BEFORE search returns "a hair inhibitor that has been sold under the Veniqa brand from Bristol Myers Squibb" but no software. Cabayi (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification (for the benefit of the sockpuppets) - if a search returns a typo for the hair inhibitor VANIQA and nothing for the software VENIQA it proves the point that the software is not notable. Thanks for biting the bait here. It provided helpful evidence for the sock puppet investigation. Cabayi (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete vanity spam by the creator of veniqa. Praxidicae (talk) 16:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
grounds for deletion unsubstantiated The Hair inhibitor brand being mentioned is VANIQA, this wiki page is for VENIQA. A simple google search should clarify the confusion. Torycontrolla (talk) 16:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)— Torycontrolla (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Action for deletion has no base I have not made any edits to Veniqa but I have used the product and it is a new product in Nepali market. VAniqa, on the other hand, has to do with BMS company. So, VEniqa and VAniqa are mutually exclusive. Please remove the deletion action as the original cause does not justify the reason for deletion.Nepal e reviewer (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC) — Nepal e reviewer (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
delete - concur with Praxidicae, vanity cruft, no SIGCOV to be found. And to the oppose !vote above, I did that simple Google search, and I did indeed find the hair product (mis?)spelled as Veniqa in several places. Regardless, no significant coverage of the software + page creator appears to be undisclosed COI as one of the founders creffett (talk) 17:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Proof : Veniqa: https://www.veniqa.com/ and Vaniqa: http://www.vaniqa.com/ . I cannot provide any more proof than this because at this point, people are not reasoning. Admin, please review the websites and google yourself before just deleting this page. Nepal e reviewer (talk) 17:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment user:Nepal e reviewer and user:Torycontrolla have been blocked as a result of this Sockpuppet review, which identified them as probable socks of Anton503 who is a major contributor to the page in question. DELETE (and probably salt) ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.