The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Coredesat 06:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All hits I found on this guy refer to a different person by this name. In all likelihood, the article in question is a hoax. Blueboy96 16:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find anything on Google linking him with the publishing house he's supposed to own, and the sources I found seemed to be about a different person with the same name. I couldn't find anything at all on this popular and unusually prolific writer... one would expect someone with the career described in the article to have a lot more written about him. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That criterion specifically excludes nonsense hoaxes ... and even then, this article isn't patent nonsense. Blueboy96 18:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, I hate hoaxes. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, hoax. --Crusio (talk) 01:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.