The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vault 106[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable record label - the only source in this article is their own webpage. A google search doesn't return much Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. XiuBouLin (talk) 23:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no coverage found in reliable sources for this label; does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Gongshow talk 16:45, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. Nice idea though. --Bejnar (talk) 04:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.