The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carlossuarez46 19:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vambudo[edit]

Vambudo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable. The article has had a notability tag for some time and recently a prod tag was added. All tags were removed with no attempt to address the issue. There are no outside sources given to substantiate the claims.Peter Rehse 03:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletions. —Peter Rehse 03:58, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for lack of evidence of notability through the provision of sources. My google search turned up some myspace stuff and trivial mentions of this, but nothing suggesting notability. Someguy1221 04:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This subject seems to have received only trivial coverage from third-party sources.-- aBSuRDiST -^T J ^C- 05:09, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. andy 09:26, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No third-party sources given to verify notability. --Maelwys 13:10, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt as a McDojo with zero reliable, independent sources proving notability. Neither a regular Google nor a Google News search provided any reliable sources. VanTucky ^(talk) 22:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No sources presented, no non trivial sources found on google search, fails notability much. Also, it's been previously deleted for lack of same .--Sandahl 23:28, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete advert for non-notable hybrid, been wikified a bit but sill advertish.--Nate1481( ^t/_c) 07:43, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.