The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vaanmathi[edit]

Non-notable film as discussed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swathi. This will never be expanded beyond the current sub-stub, because it is wholly non-notable, as it lacks the kind of critical media sources one would expect from a "blockbuster" film. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 20:20, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 00:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If this was such a blockbuster then I would have expected to be able to find references in English language newspapers such as The Hindu and The Times of India. They don't restrict their film coverage to English language films, and their archives are available via Google News, but there's nothing there. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep You need to search in the right place. I put the weak qualifier on 'cause even with in those references I don't see too many that look like they would help unstub the article. —Noah 05:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did look at those sources before nominating this AfD, and I agree that they do not provide any reasonable content upon which an encyclopedic article can be written. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 00:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.