The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VIXA

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable watch brand. The "official website" is a domain for sale. A couple of hits on non-RS sites, nothing more. Fails WP:ORG, from what I can see. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- based on searches, Vixa Pharmaceuticals appears to be more notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:ORG. Their website doesn't even exist also. SL93 (talk) 02:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Their website exist,It's just my editing error.And this is a Century enterprise，Worth keeping.Yiziyihan (talk) 08:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)— Note to closing admin: Yiziyihan (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]

Then post the website. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:17, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 12:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:ORG The brand name obviously exists because I can find mention of the watches. However I can find no in depth coverage of the brand or company. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: So VIXA is a found mention of the watches，and it Have right website.Now，why？why delete it.I doubt your positive attitudeYiziyihan (talk) 21:07, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:19, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.