The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 10:59, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uttaradhikar[edit]

Uttaradhikar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence this TV program meets WP:N notability guidelines. A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Specifically excluded are trivial coverage, such as newspaper listings of screening times and venues, "capsule reviews," plot summaries without critical commentary, or listings in comprehensive film guides or the Internet Movie Database. The single reference provided is a capsule summary by a columnist. There is no evidence of critical commentary. The article is written like a promotion and does not seem encyclopedic. --NDSteve10 (talk) 17:59, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.