The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - another non-notable vanity element. This does not exist and is not officially recognized. Google searches throw up no serious literature, only Wikipedia mirrors. Trollminator 20:43, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Strong keep; it's been synthesised, which kind of torpedoes "fictional", and the concept of a "vanity element" is nonsensical. (Note also that scientific literature rarely uses full names for these elements - often just "element 113" or "Uut", so google searching may not help. But "ununtrium site:.edu" threw up some responses...) Shimgray 20:58, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Strong keep. I found several serious mirrors. One of them being Nature though you have to registred to read it. Several sites refers to Nature as their source [1]. If Nature isn't good enough I don't know what is. Jeltz 21:31, 2004 Nov 24 (UTC)
Keep. This is clear abuse by the lister. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 21:49, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Much of vfd is clear abuse by the lister. Mark Richards 22:25, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.