The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 21:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Universidad Azteca[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:N. No reliable third party sources that describe the organization. Google Books results do not establish the organization's notability. Umhsbrek (talk) 09:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- This is a huge private university. Of course it's notable per WP:SCHOOLS. Furthermore, nom gives zero valid reasons for deletion. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 12:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in existing references suggest that it is a "huge private university". Note that WP:SCHOOLS does not point to anything but existing policy such as WP:N and WP:ORG, both of which need to be satisfied for the article to be kept. As I have mentioned in my nomination, there is no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to satisfy WP:GNG. All references used in the current article are either first party, unreliable (like worldwide.edu, which relies on content submission) or trivial mentions. Most of the references are for the accreditation the organization has but they all do not establish the notability of the subject. Please see WP:RS on identifying reliable sources. Umhsbrek (talk) 19:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? It's got more than 16,000 students. As before, you're confusing sources used in the article with notability. They're not related. If you don't yet understand WP:ARTN perhaps you ought to consider holding off on creating new AfDs until you do. Also you might consider reading WP:SCHOOLS. This one is notable. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 19:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was not only relying the lack of reliable source in the article to establish non-notability. There are no reliable sources outside of Wikipedia. I quote WP:ARTN, "If the subject has not been covered outside of Wikipedia, no amount of improvements to the Wikipedia content will suddenly make the subject notable." Where did you find that the university has more than 16,000 students? I can't seem to find it from Google, not even Spanish sources. You haven't shown me a single reliable source that establishes the notability of this university. Searching "University of Azteca" gives me 19 results while "Universidad Azteca" generates 90 results. This is hardly notable. Umhsbrek (talk) 06:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Large private university with full government certification; do some WP:BEFORE, and not just 'well not enough sources in English'; Google Translate can help you with Spanish references. The nine-edit account seeming to know how to do two AfD's also raises some alarm bells. Nate • (chatter) 20:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: a private university with 15,000+ students. These are generally kept. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.