The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 01:49, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable nonsense. This link should tell you all you need to know about this article. - CorbinSimpson 02:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as obvious silliness and send to BJAODN. dbtfztalk 02:19, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article itself says, "it has not yet recieved recognition." --Ruby 02:35, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - certainly non-notable as noted by Ruby. Possibly a hoax. —ERcheck @ 02:39, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I've actually heard of the cult and it is fairly secretive. IT's been growing rapidly and is becoming more notable by the minute —thebovine @ , 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Speedy delete as hoax. Ifnord 03:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete It's a hoax. Knowitall 18:53, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.