- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- United Nations General Assembly Resolution 58/292 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable UN resolution that is unlikely to be WP:ENDURING. Twenty years after the fact, limited to no secondary or tertiary coverage, per WP:BEFORE. There are a number of UN resolutions concerning the Israel-Palestine conflict that are lasting and impactful, such as 67, 194, 242, etc.
A more appropriate place for this is a bullet or two on List of United Nations resolutions concerning Palestine. Longhornsg (talk) 15:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As @User:Mzajac said elsewhere: "UNGA Resolutions become part of the permanent record, affect UN policy, are an indicator of international consensus, and influence international law, so [they have] lasting significance". --Omnipaedista (talk) 22:02, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: UN resolutions are of the public record. Stop wasting community time. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Dude. Chill and WP:AGF. And stop hounding me with disrespectful comments, it's getting tiresome. Longhornsg (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe go easy on the AfDs and I will. You are starting a whole load. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- There have been 2,700+ UN resolutions. Not every routine, non-enduring resolution is inherently notable or meets WP:GNG. This is a wholly appropriate AfD, now we see whether or not the community agrees with me on this. Please lower the temperature and stop attacking my perceived motives. Longhornsg (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - whilst I have some sympathy for the nom, I don't think we could really come up with a coherent !delete consensus. For one thing the history of these resolutions has been picked over in multiple books and it seems highly unlikely that there were no newspaper reports in the region. The only !delete argument might be that these are passing mentions - but I think it is going to be really difficult to sort through the whole of List of United Nations resolutions concerning Palestine and establish which are and which are not notable enough to have a page. JMWt (talk) 16:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.