The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unicole Unicron[edit]

Unicole Unicron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails basic WP:GNG. Not enough WP:RS sources. John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 05:33, 21 August 2016 (UTC) striking confirmed sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 04:41, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:48, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:48, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:48, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:48, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi, I would like to know what I can do to make this page stronger so that it will not be deleted. Unicole has been recognized by several news sources including Vice and MTV, which are linked in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.24.143.141 (talk) 05:49, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I would also like to know what can be altered, modified or updated so that this page will not be deleted as Unicole has been widely recognized with clear public presence and this article has been well sourced with accurate and significant news sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.130.205 (talk) 06:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Over the top promotion flooded with linkspam and primary sources. Only sources worth thinking about are MTV and Vice. MTV has her as part of a reality show so are not exactly independent. That leaves Vice, more accurately Motherboard, one individual source. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:19, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is also the "pophatesflops" interview source that has just been added as well as a link to Christine Teigan's tweet about Unicole (Christine also being a celebrity with 2.61million followers tweeting about Unicole is further evidence of Unicole's worldwide relevance), and I don't see how the fact that MTV was a reality show (which again reached thousands of people around the world) causes it to not be a reputable or counted source? If it is not permitted to link to any personal sites for any sources of information I can understand that and will happily take those citations down but all of the information for this page is accurately compiled and relevant. Her online presence is constantly growing with more citations forthcoming and she is presently widely known by thousands of fans across the globe which is evident by the citations already included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realmagician (talk • contribs) 07:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re "pophatesflops". Subject talking about herself, not independent, not a reliable source. Re a trivial tweet. No more need be said. Re MTV. People employed by MTV are not independent of MTV. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There is only 1 reliable and (somewhat independent) source available for the subject (Vice). The MTV source is trivial mention. This is WP:TOOSOON. The amount of link spam in the article shows that it is there to promote a currently non-notable youtube artist so I am also advocating a delete per WP:NOTPROMO. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.