The result was keep. Not an easy close at any rate: the article has serious problems regarding a neutral point of view, but the discussion has bent towards fixing rather than deleting. In this case, the article will need swift and continued attention regarding the issues brought up by DGG and others, including bias and original research. Warmly, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article attempts to list failed religious predictions. At present, it is biased towards failed Christian prophecies, but that can be fixed. More importantly, there is no clear guidelines for what counts as a failed religious prediction and inclusion here seems utterly arbitrary. Moreover, even were such guidelines available, the list would be invariably incomplete and arguably arbitrary. Finally, the topic seems utterly unencyclopedic, serving no purpose aside from a one-stop page for skeptical resources regarding prophecy. There is (and should be) no page about successful religious predictions, so why have one about failures? Phiwum (talk) 15:23, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]