The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Davewild (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uldum[edit]

While this article was recently proposed for a merge, this article has several issues hindering a successful merge, such as no sources and lack of notability.

This article has no sources whatsoever, let alone third-party sources to establish its notability to the real world and the readers who do not play the Warcraft series.

It appears to be comprised of fancruft that may attract original research to it, furthering itself from getting proper sources. IAmSasori (talk) 22:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator, enough said. Keeper | 76 23:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Even though you misused "comprise", I agree with your asessment of the article and support its deletion, and which point it should be redirected to WOW. I (talk) 04:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 11:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No notability or referencing. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, seems too specific to be covered in the parent article, so not worth merging as far as I can tell. Pagra shtak 16:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.