The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 02:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ukash[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I stand by my original prod rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement". Edits by SPA and some edit warring since does little to change my opinion; most of the added (and removed) content was unreferenced and promotional (unref claim of "Canadian Prepaid Award 2012 – Best Prepaid Marketing Campaign" etc.). Prod was removed by SPA Paywithukash (talk · contribs)... @Sargdub, JamesBWatson, and Drscox: _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:47, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:51, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:52, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I live in the UK and have come across Ukash quite a bit. They have been up for awards this year (http://www.cso.com.au/mediareleases/20828/newvoicemedia-secures-ukash-as-finalist-for-uk-it/) They've also been at the forefront in trying to raise awareness against online scams (http://www.sourcewire.com/news/84918/ukash-recognises-shop-staff-combatting-fraud). They are frequently mentioned in the press, at least here in the UK, and deserve to stay on Wikipedia, for sure. Tris2000 (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: They have won many awards, including Two Queen's Awards For Enterprises, and definitely qualify for an article. --KnightMove (talk) 08:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:58, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.