- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. JBW (talk) 20:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ui-guk Kim[edit]
- Ui-guk Kim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG. I couldn't find any reliable, independent sources that have significant coverage of the subject from a BEFORE search, and the only source that is in the article currently is unreliable. Tails Wx 01:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your concern, I added another citation for this information, I hope this is enough to allow for it to stay up. Yuri Iluliaq (talk) 02:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- That source, FamilySearch, isn't a reliable source either. Tails Wx 02:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 02:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.