The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 03:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Twam[edit]

Twam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable Neologism. I tried writing a section on Twitter referencing this term for the merge...but it sounds forced for now. If this term comes into general use, we can always add it to the article...just not yet. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 06:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC) LegoTech·(t)·(c) 06:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non notable neo. Possible redirect. Undeath (talk) 07:48, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable neologism, borderline advertisement. JIP | Talk 07:59, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to Twitter, unless it's a hoax or neologism. Can't confirm to usage of the word, so I'm leaving it up to others.. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 19:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NEO treelo _talk 23:14, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable neologism. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 03:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.