The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by DESiegel, CSD A11: Article about a subject obviously invented by article creator or associate. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian Latin alphabet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This so-called Tunisian Latin alphabet seems to be the creation of its sole contributor on Wikipedia. It falsely claims to be one of the two writing systems for writing Tunisian Arabic yet has no sources to corroborate the claim. Although the article has certainly been written in good faith, it fails to meet notability criteria and is WP:OR. Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 17:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at http://tuni1259.org/2016/02/28/busy-publishing-this-month/ it becomes evident that this Wikipedia article is essentially written about someone's blog, by the blog's own creator. Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 17:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I didn't realize this was "made up" so I hadn't paid much attention, but I have had one or more alphabet-related articles come up in my watchlist with information about the "Tunisian Latin alphabet" added to them. It should probably be removed if it's bogus. Specifically, it would seem that the contributions list of this article's main editor shows they are a single-purpose account solely adding information about this supposed Tunisian alphabet in various places on Wikipedia. LjL (talk) 17:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 18:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.