The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ramsey Island. No indication of any content beyond sheer existence as a rock (many consonants not withstanding, alas) and consensus that as such it should just be redirected. (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 14:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trwynmynachdy[edit]

Trwynmynachdy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This rock is mentioned in the Ramsey Island article and I don't think there is enough for it to have its own article as it has no special features. Tony Holkham (Talk) 22:32, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 01:50, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.