The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TrustedCompany[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did not go for G11 to have a debate before deleting it on grounds of WP:SOAPBOX, WP:ADVERT and failing WP:COMPANY in current form Devopam (talk) 14:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. The article page is nothing more than an attempt to use Wikipedia as a marketing platform. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as "minor-tech-startup spam". Just a client / investor prospectus. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.