The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tricomin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced. Not notable Rathfelder (talk) 22:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No refs for notability, fails GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I'm not seeing any worthwhile improvement for both items and my searches here and here found results of course but, again, nothing that shows worthwhile improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.