The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Treeleaf Zendo[edit]

Treeleaf Zendo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article subject does not have any coverage in reliable secondary sources, except a passing mention in one study by a German university. It appears that the Treeleaf Zendo itself wants to get rid of the page as well, though no reason for this is specified.Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 11:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC) Copy-edit.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 11:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 11:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 11:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:54, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.