- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:33, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Transrational[edit]
- Transrational (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prodded twice, both times because it is wholly redundant to Precognition. As it stands, it is largely a WP:DICDEF. 3 of the 6 references are by the inventor of the term, Ref. 5 is likely WP:PROFRINGE and may fail WP:SYNTH, and Ref. 6 is another Wikipedia article (Zaum) that uses the term, but almost certainly in a different meaning than this article. Not sure about Ref. 3, which is a book about dreams by Vine Deloria Jr., but I suspect that it is also profringe because he also wrote Red Earth, White Lies. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't think they are saying it's the same as 'Precognition' so shouldn't be redirected; but It's a non-notable term invented by a non-notable person. and with sentences like "phenomena occurring within the natural universe where information and experiences does not readily fit into the typical cause and effect structure" is basically WP:Nonsense JeffUK (talk) 16:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One of many woolly terms invented in a woolly area of thinking, with nothing about it that stands out. It's a simple enough coinage that it has probably been independently "invented" multiple times beyond the two given. XOR'easter (talk) 17:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Transpersonal_psychology. This is probably what the neologism is related to. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:81D5:6D64:11E:646B (talk) 19:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems like an overly specific target for a fairly non-specific term. I lean toward delete. RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️ (talk · contribs) 22:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable vague neologism with no extensive use among those who incline to this kind of thinking. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.