The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Train Sim[edit]

Train Sim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This new page, referenced with only sources by a single author, doesn't seem to meet the criteria for software notability (WP:NSOFT essay). A search for sources doesn't real information other than routine description in reliable sources. The one author cited (Berent, Adam), seems to be a developer for the company, posts there under Abernet, the same as the article creator here (User:Aberent). COI not declared; isn't exclusively promotional (neutral tone) so I didn't G11). Considering alternative, there's no company page (3583 bytes); there's a passing mention at Train simulator#Driving simulation (added by Aberent a few weeks ago), so I considered a merge there might be an alternative. On balance, though, given the COI, the references aren't independent of the product, which would compromise the referencing there. Klbrain (talk) 07:16, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.