The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TravellingCari 23:41, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional rules of golf[edit]

Claims to be "authority of the game of golf" but I am very dubious about its notability. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in the absence of citations from reliable sources. Stifle (talk) 13:49, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Thinly veiled advertisment for something called "TGRA", which may or may not be worthy of its own article, though I suspect the latter. Mandsford (talk) 16:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement accusation holds no water. I have been through the TRGA website TRGA website contains no advertisements and does not ask for money on any link I can find. There are external links of credibility including a professional event that will be using TRGA rulebook in an upcoming event. Also found a link on the search engine that the TRGA is supported by the Louisville golf company which has made classic golf clubs for decades. I have added that link to the list of external links on the wiki page. Both arguments here stating lack of notability, and claim of advertisement purpose or any act of deception are not viable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Astralography (talk • contribs) 06:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.