The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 19:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tracy Kenpo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable martial arts style. Nothing to show it meets WP:MANOTE and none of the sources are independent or even mention this style. Jakejr (talk) 01:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete In the world of American Kenpo (I know its a bit of a walled garden) this school is a known entity. The thing is though that with over a 1000 schools (as they claim) there should be some references beyond the primary. My vote could easily flip if a few proper references could be incorporated into the article.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no significant independent coverage to show this style is notable. The lineage is not important, for notability purposes, since notability is not inherited at WP. Papaursa (talk) 20:44, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.