The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 01:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Totally Integrated Automation[edit]

Babel fish-written article about a non-notable brand name. Essentially an advert for Siemens. -- RHaworth 02:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOT#ADVERTISING and being completely unsourced. meshach 02:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unreferenced, and gibberish. --Ouro (blah blah) 08:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsalvagably incoherent. ff m 13:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No Please,i just want to descript a strategy.and the strategy is from Siemens.that is all. i think my artikel should bleib there. thank you =)
Hallo everyone,i have read the text again about:Propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment of any kind, commercial, political, religious, or otherwise. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to approach a neutral point of view. i think what i done, i mean the link. that is not wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Show Time 2008 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 10:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable neogolism.--Gavin Collins 10:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable in-company(?) something... unsourced & probably unsourcable. SkierRMH 22:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.