The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 15:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Torre di Roccabruna[edit]

Torre di Roccabruna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating this for deletion as I couldn't find a CSD criteria for it. No references, does not appear to be notable in any way. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no references to speak of, and I couldn't find any with a BEFORE search. SportingFlyer talk 05:58, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment There are actually two Roccabruna towers. The one in Siena described in the article and in its Italian homologue(mentioned a.o. in [1], [2], [3]). The other, arguably more notable, is part of the Hadrian Villa complex in Tivoli near Rome ([4], [5], [6], [7] and many more). 37.117.118.138 (talk) 15:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep: I found an Engish source and linked the article to its Italian homologue. Nowadays it's not the most important building of Siena, but imho it has its own history and the article can be of some interest.--Pampuco (talk) 18:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Agree with Pampuco that it's not the most important building in Siena, but it's quite notable. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:14, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.