The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 05:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tonka Rescue Patrol[edit]

Tonka Rescue Patrol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Orphaned stub, apparently about a game. Its one and only sentence is spam. Lack of context/content almost makes it a contender for a speedy deletion, but just in case it's a horribly notable game I thought I'd bring it here to be rescued. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Neutral Has 666 Ghits, mostly resales of used games but not even reviewed by IGN, a useful source for video games. Released 2003. Have put a notice on Project:Video Games to see if anyone's keen on rescuing this but as it stands it fails notability. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 00:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep I can certainly see how this one ended up at AFD, probably one of the least notable GameCube games in existence... however! Gamefreaks365 review, GameSpy E3 Preview, the composer produced work for several other games and according to his own page the game's music received an award (whether it's a desperately notable award is to be seen). GameSpot lists the game as having been reviewed by Nintendo Power here, there may be some other magazine reviews somewhere. There's pretty much nothing else on the web.Someone another 01:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Someone another. Notable, especially the Nintendo Power coverage sounds promising for notability. We shouldn't delete articles because we happen to cannot get a certain magazine. User:Krator (t c) 11:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• comment - awesome. Does anyone want to add those sources, or the content, to the article itself? Cos, right now, it's a 1-sentence stub that doesn't even assert notability. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete Only reviewed by one major outlet (I don't think gamefreaks365 cna be considered "significant secondary coverage" per WP:N) means that it's not that worthy of noitce, per WP:N. hbdragon88 22:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Notability has been far from proved in the one line stub. That the game existed is shown by the two reviews, but if people are scrabbling around to find a possible third or fourth review that in itself is damning proof that this game lacks any kind of significant existence, let alone notability. 666 ghits is pathetic - my user name is unique to me, and I get 44,600 ghits - but I'm not notable. Delete, piss on it, and let's get on with building an encyclopedia about stuff that rocks! SilkTork *SilkyTalk 23:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.