This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 June 17. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tow talk 22:21, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Do we really need an article explaining this? Although the information on the article might be notable, it is not notable enough to carry an entire article for itself. All this time articles whould be merged into a Time in the United States article. Also, i think this is information that would only be needed on the articles related to time zones (which already have a list), and written on the infobox of each one of those states. Not in a separate article. Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 04:09, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((merge))
, ((mergeto))
, ((mergefrom))
, etc., then users discuss it on one of the article talk pages. It's usually for articles in which it is difficult to see how one topic is truly separate from others. It's also used when it is obvious that the articles obviously cover the same subject, and there is a question about which one should be the "main" article and which should be merged in and redirected. This is a more informal process than Articles for Deletion, and sometimes sits around a long time before being resolved; on the other hand, sometimes it doesn't last very long at all, because the person proposing the merger is fairly sure about it and just wants to make sure that nobody objects. Sometimes only part of the material is merged (a "section merge").