The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Core desat 06:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Trebes[edit]

No appearance in a professional league, therefore WP:BIO not met Kevin McE (talk) 20:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable footballer. No independent non trivial WP:RS - also fails the football guidelines. Obina (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable per WP:BIO. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:N for football players. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO#Athletes. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 21:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Possible deletion Perhaps we should wait until tomorrow, it is the last time he will be called up to the Barnet squad, and according to their website he may make his debut then. I know I shouldn't crystal-ball, but if he doesn't play I would endorse deletion. Cg29692 (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Trebes won't play - FACT Jimbo^[online] 18:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment How do you know this? Cg29692 (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen him play, Fairclough's no mug Jimbo^[online] 22:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Rochdale game is off, Trebes won't play, delete article Cg29692 (talk) 19:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.