The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sr13 07:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
More self-serving and promotional than notoriety Shoessss 17:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most notable claim is to have been the student of the student of Bruce Lee. No sources of notability.--Work permit 03:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 23:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Blatant advertising (CSD G12) and NN subject. ~Magnus animum ∵ ∫φ γ 01:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The only way this martial arts hobbyist could become notable would be if he beat up someone famous. Qworty 02:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - definitely nothing more than an ad. A martial arts instructor in Redlands? Maybe he's notable for being the only martial artist in Redlands... BlackberryLaw 08:15, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of notability, no references.The Sunshine Man 11:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable and well-respected martial artist; please note the six books listed. The Hsing-i kung-fu books are rare and valuable English-language works on the subject. This is a notable martial artist and not a hobbyist. He has intentionally kept a low profile over the years. (I am in no way affiliated with him or his group.) The Wed, night club is also well-known. JJL 17:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable, well-respected, and well known martial artist in the Jeet-Kune-Do world and in martial arts in general. He is is one of the top instructors world-wide. I'll try to find some sources to assert notability. --Kimontalk 22:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep please the person is very notable in martial artist world yuckfoo 00:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.