The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 11:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Was tagged as CSD A7, but it has already been through CSD and PROD in the past, so I'm bringing it here to discuss. Reach Out to the Truth 20:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This article seems to have a good chunk of articles that link to it internally and gets quite a few google hits. Although its not mainstream it is far from not notable. It is also one of the few non tech related podcasts on the TWiT.tv (network) further strengthening the reason for its inclusion. andyzweb (talk) 20:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to add a note that if this AfD passes I am going on a witch hunt for any other poorly cited or referenced podcasts on wikipedia and nominate the them for AfD andyzweb (talk) 05:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do so as it will benefit us all.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.98.38.71 (talk)
Delete: No citations. Still no justifiable reason to have an entry. if Andyzweb wants it kept, put your money where your mouth is and rewrite the entire article. As it stands this is superfluous nonsense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.98.38.71 (talk) 03:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.