The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thermomagnetic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This dab is unnecessary, because every link here is "Thermomagnetic X" where X can just as easily be placed in the article as it would be placed here. Plus, creating the actual link avoids the dab. Primefac (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:43, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — Gorthian (talk) 23:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or (2nd choice) redirect. These entries are all partial-title matches because "thermomagnetic" is an adjective. Per WP:ADJECTIVE, the page should redirect to Thermomagnetism, the noun, but there is no article at that title. If redirected, my choice for a target would be Thermomagnetic effect, since that takes the reader straight to a definition. But my first choice is to delete. — Gorthian (talk) 23:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for above reasons. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per WP:ADJECTIVE with no suitable page for redirect. Flat Out (talk) 02:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per WP:ADJECTIVE.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.