- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The praxisphere[edit]
- The praxisphere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable neologism. Prod contested by article creator. Apparently self-promotion by the neologism's creator. Only evidence of use of the word is by an unrelated company. --Finngall talk 02:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per above, no references for any use of the term, page creator appears to be using it for promotional purposes. JamesG5 (talk) 02:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable theory, and self-promoting.--MainlyTwelve (talk) 03:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, unsourced neologism --ȸ (talk) 03:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete To echo my fellow Wikipedians, this is non-notable and seems to break WP:PROMOTION. Amccann421 (talk) 03:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 04:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:A11 – Fairly obviously posted by the term's inventor since it says it's "credited to Dr. Martin Trevino Jr" and the page creator is Mtrevjr. I've re-read the article a few times and I'm not seeing the "credible claim of importance". The article consists of an explanation of the term and a short account of the background, as far as I can tell. —Nizolan (talk) 17:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged as WP:G7 as the author blanked the page (though was reverted). —Nizolan (talk) 12:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.