The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 16:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Yard Went On Forever[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

there is not any information regarding the chart. not meet notability criteria Coekon (talk) 05:13, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable artist, deletion brings no benefit to the encyclopedia's coverage of late-60s pop music, sufficient coverage of this record can be found at GBooks[1] and GNews[2], such as [3][4][5][6] --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The subject does in fact meet the criteria for notability. If the above links are not sufficient, I can produce more. In addition to being an innovative pop album from the late sixties, it reflects an important phase in the early career of songwriter Jimmy Webb, who wrote the songs for the album. He also produced and arranged the material. I'm planning to expand the article. Rjaklitsch (talk) 10:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Keep Article should either get material and references added, or be condensed and merged into the artist's article. North8000 (talk) 14:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per arguments of North8000 and Rjaklitsch. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 18:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because it's a brilliant album! Sorry, I mean it's a notable work by two notable artists. And it's a very new article which could be developed. I'd be quite happy to do some work on this.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 01:56, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Someone left an AFD out in the rain . . . . Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:43, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources added to article; the album also peaked at number 27 on the Billboard 200 chart. Taking everything into account, subject meets WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow ^Talk 03:36, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.