The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Vanity Diet[edit]

Fails WP:NOTE. Book by a non notable author from an unknown publisher (e-book?) has not received any attention in reliable independent sources. 22 Distinct Google hits. No Google News, Books or Scholar hits. No claim to notability is made in the article. Fram (talk) 13:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated: Weightrix (neologism introduced in the above book)

Delete both - vanity articles with no reliable source to establish notability.--Boffob (talk) 14:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both As noted above, no claim of notability, nor evidence provided, nor evidence found in a search. Nothing about the article recommends inclusion, and as the neologism mentioned is created for the book, it too has absolutely no claim to notability. Wikipedia is not for promotion of your book. Theseeker4 (talk) 14:18, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NOtability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.