The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snow delete by JodyB. Non-admin closure. Blueboy96 14:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since when are swimming pools notable? Clarityfiend 00:35, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete I don't know what this is, but it ain't an article. Any way we can snow this garbage?Blueboy96 00:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete: Completely pointless and not notable. - Kneel17 00:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete - is there a case for this to be speedied under a7? --Xorkl000 00:51, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it's a swimming pool. My neighbours have one. It doesn't need an article either. --Haemo 00:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete "...the lifeguards at the Trails Pool are some of the craziest people located on planet Earth" is an inadequate assertion of notability... <cough> --Malcolmxl5 00:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Come on! How did this nonsense escape a speedy? Blatant NPOV violations bordering on vandalism. This is a no-brainer. Drown this article. Realkyhick 02:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete That's nonsense, it's a pool. Oysterguitarist 03:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Swimming pools are, in general, not notable. Everybody and their brother has one. This swimming pool is only slightly more notable than my cat. Bart133 (t)(c) 03:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Any article that asserts its notability by saying it's "the MOST AMAZING SWIMMING POOL ever" needs to be slapped with a deletion. How did this get past the NP patrollers and remain undetected for a week? Spellcast 04:36, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this 'shenanigans' version. Without prejudice if a decent, referenced version about the actual park shows up sometime in the future. Sohelpme 04:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Per above. Not notable. Pointless. Wikidudeman(talk) 06:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete I mean just read it... not only does it violate WP:N it also stinks of WP:SPAM. MartinDK 09:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete mind-numbingly non-notable, paradoxically written as both spam ("the MOST AMAZING SWIMMING POOL ever") and attack ("opened in 1997 and has not been cleaned since"). Kill it quick. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.