The result was delete. I'm not seeing a strong argument to keep, and I am seeing a persuasive argument against redirecting. If a list entry is created at some point, this discussion does not preclude a future redirect. Vanamonde (Talk) 09:57, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article about an online music magazine, not properly referenced as passing WP:NMEDIA. As always, websites are not "inherently" notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to have their significance externally validated by being the subject of WP:GNG-worthy coverage and analysis -- but this is referenced almost entirely to the magazine's own self-published content, either on its own website or on Google Groups copies of it, and the only third-party source is not reliable or GNG-worthy either.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to be the subject of coverage in sources other than itself. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 05:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. How do folks feel about a Redirect here?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)