The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g1, patent nonsense, or WP:SNOW if you prefer. NawlinWiki 14:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Sovereign Principality of Jaridia[edit]

The Sovereign Principality of Jaridia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

This article, which has managed to survive for over a week now, is a whole cloth fabrication complete with imagined statistics. Nominating because even hoaxes like this are arguably not speedyable, and this is the sort of thing that tends to get de-prodded. Serpent's Choice 11:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a thousand times. Somebody else using wikipedia to attack France. Ho-hum! Keresaspa 15:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete but it's the funniest thing I've seen all day. Move to WP:BJ or even Uncyclopedia. Walton monarchist89 17:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Wow, can't believe this survived a week.--Jersey Devil 17:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Someone, somewhere has far too much time on their hands. --The Way 18:08, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's bad enough that this can't (I think) be speedied. Do not move to WP:BJ unless you think everyone else likes wasting their time nominating and deleting this garbage. This is what blogs are for. - Aagtbdfoua 20:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Move to Uncyclopedia. —dima/s-ko/ 20:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Though it is a clever parody. And don't forget to track down linked hoax articles or hoaxes from the same source. Edison 22:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pretty sure the rest have been speedied A1, as this was the only article with any substance. However, the images should be deleted when the article goes ... there are quite a lot of them. Serpent's Choice 06:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete hoax, patent nonsense, BJAODN etc. Dragomiloff 01:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete please do not BJAODN. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.