The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jupitus Smart 17:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Soccer War (book)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability for this book. The only reference has a void URL and can't be checked. Searches yield nothing of any merit. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Massive number of laudatory reviews, here's the new archive search I ran [1]. the archive is behind a paywall, I don't know it that search can be seen by editors without access to Proquest. But in all events, the book is notable, article needs to be sourced. E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note that many reviews come up on a simple google search of Kapuściński + "the soccer war" [2]. Same search on gNews [3]. E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And stuff like this [4]. Article needs an editor.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:48, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK, plenty of review available including Publishers Weekly, Kirkus Reviews, Booklist, Library Journal Bamboo by William Boyd, London Review of Books. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:35, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Passes WP:BOOKCRIT and WP:GNG: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] (subscription required). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:32, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.